-
國內財務簽證及PCAOB財務簽證
真正讓我們與眾不同的是我們服務客戶的經驗,讓正大所能夠在客戶服務上面創造更多的價值
-
稅務簽證
國稅局對於優質會計師事務所出具之報告作書面審核,公司被選案查核機率較低
-
營業稅簽證
本所採用Grant Thornton Voyager 軟體及其他軟體工具等,來提升工作效率
-
公開發行及上市櫃專案輔導與規劃
本所特將會計師與經理群之菁英分成八大部,組成團隊並提供最迅速而完善之專業服務
-
IFRS專區
分享Grant Thornton International之國際財務報導準則專業服務團隊及成員所內專家之寶貴經驗
-
移轉訂價服務
移轉訂價服務
-
跨國交易租稅規劃
跨國交易租稅規劃
-
外國專業投資機構之稅務代理人(FINI/FIDI)
外國專業投資機構之稅務代理人(FINI/FIDI)
-
所得稅法第4條,第8條及第25條等專案申請
所得稅法第4條,第8條及第25條等專案申請
-
租稅協定之專案申請
租稅協定之專案申請
-
租稅獎勵申請
租稅獎勵申請
-
稅負平衡政策訂定與假定稅計算
稅負平衡政策訂定與假定稅計算
-
代為計算薪資及各項扣繳
代為計算薪資及各項扣繳
-
資遣通報
資遣通報
-
處理薪資轉帳事宜及繳納扣繳稅款
處理薪資轉帳事宜及繳納扣繳稅款
-
勞保賠償給付申請
勞保賠償給付申請
-
勞健保,二代健保及退休金之申報及繳納
勞健保,二代健保及退休金之申報及繳納
-
年底開立扣繳憑單
年底開立扣繳憑單
-
IT 顧問服務
IT 顧問服務
-
PRIMA 顧問服務
PRIMA 顧問服務
-
營運計劃書編制
營運計劃書編制
-
績效考核服務
正大聯合會計師事務所協助企業進行績效制度建立及優化,創造勞資雙贏的局面。
-
沙賓氏法案第404條遵循查核
沙賓氏法案第404條遵循查核
-
內部稽核服務
內部稽核服務
-
協議程序(併購交易實地查核)
協議程序(併購交易實地查核)
-
風險管理服務
協議程序(併購交易實地查核)
-
舞弊調查服務
舞弊調查服務
-
電腦鑑識服務
電腦鑑識服務
-
外籍人士工作證申請
外籍人士工作證申請
-
商業文件英日文翻譯服務
商業文件英日文翻譯服務
-
公司、分公司、行號設立登記
公司、分公司、行號設立登記
-
外商分公司、辦事處設立登記
外商分公司、辦事處設立登記
-
陸資來台投資設立登記
陸資來台投資設立登記
-
行政救濟
行政救濟
-
企業法律諮詢
企業法律諮詢
-
破產與限制
破產與限制
-
公司解散和清算
公司解散和清算
-
供應商和員工背景調查
供應商和員工背景調查
-
存證信函草稿服務
存證信函草稿服務
-
中英文協議的準備和審查
中英文協議的準備和審查
-
放寬限制出境
放寬限制出境
-
勞動法合規與勞資談判
勞動法合規與勞資談判
-
企業和個人資產規劃
企業和個人資產規劃
-
企業評價服務
企業評價服務
-
ESG 確信報告及相關顧問業務
正大聯合會計師事務所取得了金管會授權辦理 ESG 確信業務(永續報告及溫室氣體)。 目前已經協助許多企業辦理ESG相關業務,如需更多相關資訊,歡迎與我們ESG負責的會計師聯絡。
-
網際網路購物包裝減量會計師確信報告服務
「公司之資本額、實收資本額或中華民國境內營運資金」達1.5億元以上,或自有到店取貨據點數達500以上之網際網路零售業,在包裝減量方面在包裝減量方面,應依平均包裝材減重率或循環箱(袋)使用率規定擇一辦理,且其減量成果須於每年3月31日前經會計師出具確信報告。關於會計師確信報告服務,歡迎跟我們聯絡。
![ESG & Sustainability 企業永續發展](/globalassets/1.-member-firms/taiwan/media/featured/esg_464x422.jpg)
-
其他政府委託專案查核
其他政府委託專案查核
-
財團法人及社團法人等非營利組織(公益慈善基金會)
財團法人及社團法人等非營利組織(公益慈善基金會)
-
文化教育相關產業(私立學校)
文化教育相關產業(私立學校)
Deryck Williams shares some insights from global charities on the real risks involved with social media
The dangers of social media are clear, but the risk to a charity of not getting involved is far greater. A story that emerged during the research for our new report, ‘Growing communities: How charity leaders govern social media globally to thrive online’, illustrates this perfectly. The RSPCA Queensland in Australia were faced with disaster during the 2011 floods, with animals in their shelters at risk from rising waters. Yet using a Facebook post, they were able to temporarily rehome 350 animals in just a few hours. Few other tools could manage that feat so efficiently.
Our interviews for the ‘Growing communities’ report revealed that isolating risks and applying appropriate resources should be best practice for boards and senior management. From my perspective there are two main risks to be managed: technology and reputation. Charities have a fair understanding of reputational risk, but aren’t so good at profiling technological risk. However, regular meetings to ensure consistency and including social media in the charity’s enterprise risk management plan will help mitigate risks and identify opportunities.
One of the key ways that charities can manage technological risk from social media is through efficient monitoring, although resourcing it can be problematic. If a charity’s social media activity is the preserve of one or two people, they reduce the ability to tackle problems head on and can affect consistency if they leave.
An active online community steps up to rebuff critics, but the primary information has to come from the charity and its experts. Using specialist tools that report on keywords and sentiment in social media gives charities the opportunity to step in if negative or false reports are circulating, and to feed into beneficial conversations at the right time. As with many tools, budget may dictate their accuracy, so charities should be careful about their use.
Giving staff training to identify risks and the means to report and counter them is a good start. Making sure senior levels understand the technological as well as reputational risks of social media is essential. Since managing technological risk may be difficult for charities, the speed and effectiveness of their response is all the more important.
Avoiding risk means asking who has access, when they should join the conversation, and how they should speak. Some organisations insist on mandatory social media training for all staff online to avoid reputational risk through unqualified commentary, careless remarks or simply contradictory, repetitive conversations. Guidelines can also be issued at a volunteer level to minimise exposure to risk, though this is only advised if your volunteers are experienced and can be relied on to manage your online reputation.
Reporting on social media should be part of the larger enterprise risk management reporting structure, but ad-hoc reporting to the board in extreme cases seems to be the general rule, with few charities having social media-specific lines of reporting. If staff have robust guidelines and training, they can be left to self-moderate.
Simplicity is the key to setting successful protocols. Don’t create obstacles that cause an overly cautious approach. People rarely read policy unless they think they may have broken it, so keep guidelines simple, open and accessible, much like the medium itself.
Risks will always be present on social media but they are outweighed by the opportunities it offers. Understanding the dangers strategically rather than expecting operational involvement from the board is the best way forward.
Deryck Williams is national leader of charities and Not for Profit, Grant Thornton Canada.